The $10,000 Question: 3 Thought Experiments on Money, Happiness & Minimalism

Last month I saved another $10,000. My first thought was, "That's fine." Then, the real question hit: What does this actually change? Not much. It doesn't meaningfully move the needle on the one thing I want: a decent home for my future family. Not in this city, and not even if I doubled my wealth. It doesn't alter my daily joy. I’d hit financial satiation — a concept I knew from Daniel Kahneman's research but only now understood in my bones. High income improves life evaluation, but not daily emotional well-being. My hedonic treadmill had stopped. Instead of being depressing, it was liberating. If it doesn't matter, why stress? The question needed to shift from 'How much money do I have?' to 'What life do I need money for?' This financial clarity bled into a material one. As a long-time minimalist, I'd still feared losing my savings and my gear. Giving things away relieved me. I don't need much. A passport, a place to live, a device to do work, and freedom of movement. If I lost $10,000, nothing changes. If I lost everything, it would be frustrating, but I'd climb back. My safety net isn't a number in a bank; it's my ability to create value. After a large investment, I lived paycheck to paycheck for six months. It was stressful, but I didn't starve and didn't cancel plans with friends. I was fine. The lesson stuck: I want that same focus and intentionality, but with the safety net of savings eliminating the stress. If I were robbed, I could still work. Building skills, and providing this ability to others is more important than savings. Even stripped bare, I have a family support system — a privilege I don't take for granted. The most important things, like time with friends, are nearly free. And if I had enough money not to bother working again, I would still do it. Though the nature of work would change, yes. It may not be a job in traditional sense. But it will still be work. The Specifics of My 'Enough' So, if more savings don't matter, what does? I shifted the question from 'How much money do I have?' to 'What life do I need money for?' I defined the meaningful costs for the life I want — not luxuries, but foundations for a family: * Modest Flat In A World-Class City — a home, not a penthouse * Reliable Car (a Toyota Corolla or a base-model BMW, a small flex) — for the practical necessity of family life, not status * Extended Trip Around The World * Gym Membership * Renewing Essential Tech (laptop, phone, camera). * Food & Groceries. The sum is a number so large it feels abstract. But its power isn't in the total; it's in the clarity. These are specific, meaningful goals. The cost is a defined target, not a source of anxiety. The list can feel crushing. So the immediate question becomes: what's the MVP for the next year? What experience can you have now? New experiences and time with friends & family beat everything on that list above. That initial feeling of liberation was real. Defining 'enough' by what truly matters is the ultimate clarity. The money is just a tool. The list is just a sketch. The real project is building a life so engaging that the pursuit of more money becomes optional, not central. This was my calculation. Not of wealth, but of purpose. I invite you to do yours. Does an extra grand in the bank truly bring you joy, or is it just a number? If not, what should you do instead? What do you want to acquire and experience? Why? What kind of life do you need money for? What's on your list?