Recently I wanted to buy a good vintage camera. I've bought Olympus OM-2 in stellar condition and it wasn't cheap. And now I feel like Gollum saying "my precious" and never take pictures with it. Because it's old, may potentially break, Olympus doesn't produce film cameras and this model specifically anymore... So I've bought a cheap and used Zenit TTL for a fraction of Olympus price, almost for free. I can buy ten of those. I like this camera, and if I break it, I'll be sad nevertheless. But I don't baby over it. I will take it to hell and back. Functionally they're not that different. So I'm probably going to sell the Olympus. I'll just keep the simple stuff. Zenit TTL feels sturdy like an AK-47, so I'm chill. Don't get me wrong, Olympus feels the same way... But it kinda feels more like a museum piece. It's more like an M1 Garand, you probably wouldn't beat it and take it through mud. Same concept is applicable to digital cameras, but I'm not quite there yet. An ideal camera doesn't exist. Light, small, IBIS, looks cool, full frame, lots of megapixels but stellar big pixels. Bright, sharp, light, small, stabilized zoom Lens with distinct vintage look. It's pretty much impossible. You'll have to pick and choose. Hoarding gear doesn't benefit anyone, especially my wallet. Gear accumulates dust. I have too many cameras and lenses, but realistically how much do I use and how often? I'm planning to reduce my collection to: Panasonic Lumix GM1 with a pancake lens Fujifilm X-T30 with a 16-80 zoom lens Zenit TTL with Helios 44-2 50/2 Holga 120CN ...and a Nikon 50 1.8 vintage lens which I don't know where and how to stick it to and which I can't and won't sell because it's perfect... (I would happily stick it on the Zenit though, but I'm afraid that's almost impossible)